The tradition permits Irish, Dutch, French, German and Belgian vessels to angle inside six and 12 nautical miles of UK coastline.
Condition Secretary Michael Gove said the move would help reclaim control of angling access to UK waters.
The European Commission said it “observed” yet felt the tradition had been superseded by EU law.
Ireland’s clergyman for horticulture, sustenance and the marine, Michael Creed, be that as it may, said it was “unwelcome and unhelpful”.
“Brexit postures intense difficulties to the fish area and this declaration will shape some portion of the arrangements,” he said.
The Scottish government upheld the thought, saying it had been squeezing for it “for quite a while”.
The London Fisheries Convention sits close by the EU Common Fisheries Policy, which permits all European Union nations access in the vicinity of 12 and 200 nautical miles of the UK and sets shares for how much fish countries can get.
The connection between the UK and Ireland is additionally administered by a different course of action.
Pulling back from the tradition, which was marked in 1964 preceding the UK joined what turned into the EU, implies UK vessels will likewise lose the privilege to angle in waters six to 12 nautical miles seaward of alternate nations.
What happens to the 12 to 200 mile territory will be one of the issues in question in Brexit arrangements.
Read more on how Brexit would influence angling waters
At the point when the UK left the EU it would turn into a “free beach front state”, he said.
He said the EU’s normal fisheries strategy had been a natural debacle and the administration needed to change that, upon Brexit, to guarantee feasible fish stocks in future.
In any case, the SNP’s Richard Lochhead, who held the post of fisheries serve in Scotland until a year ago, has worries around angling being utilized as a “negotiating concession” by the administration, which would “let down UK anglers”.
“Michael Gove is doing his best to get most extreme reputation out of the simple piece,” he revealed. “Be that as it may, the troublesome, complex piece is still to come [with] the Common Fisheries Policy.
UKIP’s fisheries representative Mike Hookem likewise said he dreaded another “discount selling out” without confirmations about the 200-mile zone.
“Angling people group crosswise over Britain voted to leave the EU to get back the rights to acquire a living, bolster their groups and to stop the EU pillaging our oceans of fish that the UK could abuse monetarily,” he said.
He included that the declaration was “no triumph for the angling group” and was rather an “administration endeavor to utilize smoke and mirrors to assuage British anglers, while in the meantime having the alternative of giving most our angling rights to the EU”.
Government figures say angling contributed £604m to UK GDP in 2015 and utilized around 12,000 fishers. In 2016, the fish handling industry upheld around 18,000 occupations.
The business’ body, the National Federation of Fishermen’s Organizations, respected the choice.
CEO Barrie Deas stated: “This is welcome news and a critical piece of setting up the UK as a free seaside state with power over its own particular restrictive financial zone.”
Its administrator Mike Cohen said a 12-mile restrictive zone for UK pontoons would be “something worth being thankful for” for the UK’s inshore angling armada.
Will McCallum, Greenpeace UK head of seas, said leaving the tradition would not in itself convey a superior future for the UK angling industry, and that for quite a long time governments had reprimanded the EU for their “disappointment” to help the little scale, supportable fishers.
He stated, for instance, that the UK had the power since 2013 to choose how to designate its EU angling standard yet that a report by Greenpeace in 2016 had discovered very nearly 66% of that share was packed in the hands of three organizations.
He said the UK would likewise still be bound by the UN tradition of the law of the oceans – which requires participation with neighbors.
Yet, Mr McCallum said he was “energized” that the legislature was making angling a need, subsequent to dreading angling groups would wind up “at the base of the stack” in the midst of complex Brexit arrangements.
Ecological law office ClientEarth expert Dr Tom West said the move gave off an impression of being a forceful arranging strategy.
“As a nation outside the EU we have to consider how we can best co-work with our neighbors, as opposed to singularly pulling back from all understandings with the expectation that remaining solitary will improve us.”